Client Perspectives
What clients have said about working with us
We share these accounts with the permission of those involved. Names and identifying details have been adjusted to protect confidentiality.
Back to Home80+
Engagements completed
4.8
Average client rating
12+
Years of practice
92%
Clients who return
Client Accounts
Engagements, as described by clients
We had been through a difficult quarter and were not sure we were reading our own risk picture clearly. The review helped us see what was there without creating alarm. The written report has been referred to at two board meetings since.
Zainudin Ariff
CFO, Financial Services — Kuala Lumpur
Risk Landscape Review · March 2025
The framework we developed with Auric Den is the first one in six years that our team actually uses. The narrative companion was particularly helpful — it explained the thinking to people who had not been in the working sessions.
Priya Lakshmanan
Head of Compliance — Selangor
Risk Framework Advisory · February 2025
We contacted Auric Den after a governance matter that had been difficult for the leadership team. The session was well-structured and felt respectful throughout. The note they produced afterwards was useful in thinking about next steps.
Rajan Krishnaswamy
Managing Director — Kuala Lumpur
Incident Reflection Session · April 2025
I appreciated that they were not alarmist. They described what they found plainly, without trying to make the situation seem worse than it was. The recommendations were specific and actionable, not generic advisories.
Nurul Zahira
Chief Risk Officer — Kuala Lumpur
Risk Landscape Review · January 2025
The fee was clear from the start, and so was the scope. We knew exactly what we were getting and when. In our experience, that kind of predictability in an advisory engagement is less common than it should be.
Ahmad Mukhriz
CEO, Professional Services — KL
Risk Framework Advisory · March 2025
Working through the risk landscape together helped our leadership team develop a shared language around risk. Previously, people were using the same words to mean different things. The review gave us a common reference point.
Siti Tanaka
Board Member — Selangor
Risk Landscape Review · February 2025
Case Accounts
Three engagements, in brief
Case Account 01 — Financial Services Firm, Kuala Lumpur · Risk Landscape Review
The situation
A mid-sized financial advisory firm had grown significantly over two years and was preparing for a licensing renewal with the Securities Commission. Leadership was uncertain whether their operational risk picture had kept pace with the organisation's growth.
What we did
We conducted a Risk Landscape Review over three weeks — interviewing the CEO, CFO, compliance officer, and two team leads. We reviewed documented incidents and near-misses from the previous twelve months, alongside their existing risk register.
What followed
The written review identified five areas warranting attention, two of which had not appeared in their existing register. The firm addressed three of these before their licensing renewal. The review was shared with the board and used to structure a subsequent planning session.
Case Account 02 — Professional Services Group · Risk Framework Advisory
The situation
A professional services group with offices in Kuala Lumpur and Penang had an outdated risk register that had not been meaningfully updated in four years. Their board had asked management to bring a revised risk framework to the next AGM.
What we did
We worked alongside their compliance team over six weeks, holding three facilitated sessions to rebuild their framework from the existing structure outward. We produced a revised risk register, an escalation and reporting rhythm document, and a narrative companion for leadership.
What followed
The framework was presented at the AGM and accepted without significant revision. Their compliance team has since taken full ownership of the register, with quarterly review cycles in place. The narrative companion has been used in onboarding two new senior hires.
Case Account 03 — Healthcare Administration Organisation · Incident Reflection Session
The situation
Following a reputational incident that had received limited media attention, the CEO and two senior directors wanted a space to reflect carefully on what had occurred and how it had been handled — away from the internal pressure to move quickly past the event.
What we did
We read the relevant communications and internal documentation before the session. The three-hour session was held at a neutral venue and focused on what had contributed to the incident, how the response had been handled, and what the leaders wished they had understood earlier.
What followed
The short written note we produced was used by the board as a reference point in their post-incident review. The CEO later described it as more useful than the formal incident report, because it focused on understanding rather than compliance. The organisation subsequently engaged us for a landscape review.
Our Credentials
MIA Professional Development Recognition
Recognised contributor to risk governance education for practitioners in Malaysia.
ISO 31000 Aligned Practice
Our framework and landscape work draws on ISO 31000 principles, adapted for the Malaysian operating context.
IIRM Affiliate
Affiliated with the Institute of Internal Risk Management, maintaining current standards across our practice.
Get in Touch
Speak with us about your situation
Whether you have a clear need or simply want to think aloud, we are glad to take a call or respond to a note.
Suite 10-4, Menara Standard Chartered, 30 Jalan Sultan Ismail, 50250 Kuala Lumpur
— Your Organisation
These accounts describe work that is available to your organisation too.
The right starting point is usually a conversation. We are glad to listen before proposing anything.